USA – Germany Commercial Contracts

Comparative contract structure, risk allocation, and enforcement analysis for
U.S.–German commercial transactions
U.S.–German commercial contracts often fail not at the drafting stage, but at enforcement—where structural assumptions diverge sharply between the two systems.
‍

Scope of Analysis

The analysis is enforcement-focused, addressing where U.S. drafting logic conflicts with German legal constraints in practice.
This page focuses on structural and enforcement-driven differences between U.S. and German commercial contract practice, with emphasis on risk allocation, remedies, governing law, and dispute resolution.

Key Focus Areas

Contract formation and formal requirements  
Risk allocation and limitation of liability  
Termination rights and remedies  
Governing law and forum selection  
Enforcement and litigation risk


This page illustrates the analytical framework applied across U.S. cross-border transactions, including China, Russia, and other high-divergence jurisdictions.
This framework reflects recurring failure points observed in U.S.–German transactions, where contractual certainty in one system does not translate into enforceability in the other.